Re: revert yenta free_irq on suspend

[Benjamin Herrenschmidt]

On Sun, 2005-07-31 at 23:03 -0400, ambx1@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> Also, as I said earlier, the better we support OSPM initiated power
> management, the more likely APM will break.  This may be technically
> unavoidable on some isolated boxes without quirks.  I agree with
> Pavel that "do nothing" may make sense, but it seems some devices
> may still need to be disabled by the OS.  As a real world example,
> we currently can't turn off cardbus bridges because it breaks APM
> on a couple of older laptops.

Won't freeing of IRQs cause problems with things like handhelds that
actually rely on an interrupt to wake up ?

Ben.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/