Re: [PATCH] Stacker - single-use static slots

[serue]

Quoting serue@xxxxxxxxxx (serue@xxxxxxxxxx):
> Quoting James Morris (jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx):
> > On Wed, 3 Aug 2005 serue@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > 
> > > The attached patch implements your idea on top of my previous patchset.
> > > Following is performance data on a 16-way ppc.  dbench and tbench were
> > > run 50 times, kernbench and reaim 10 times each;  results are mean +/-
> > > 95% confidence half-interval.  The 'static slot' kernel had a single
> > > static slot for selinux, plus the (unused in this case) shared struct
> > > hlist_head security.
> > 
> > Can you also compare with no stacker at all (i.e. just SELinux with caps 
> > as secondary module) ?
> 
> Will do.
> 
> I'll try to get a full set of numbers by next week, comparing:
> 
> 	no stacker
> 	"original" stacker
> 	stacker with one shared slot
> 	stacker with two shared slots

Obviously, I meant to say stacker with one static slot (and one shared
slot), and stacker with two static slots (and one shared slot)  :)

thanks,
-serge
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/