Re: [ck] 2.6.12-ck5

From: scientica (GMail)
Date: Sat Aug 06 2005 - 02:41:23 EST


Con Kolivas wrote:

>-schediso2.12.diff
>SCHED_ISO was dropped entirely. It broke in ck4, and there is now a decent
>defacto standard for unprivileged realtime in mainline kernel with realtime
>RLIMITS so I'm supporting the use of that instead.
>
>
Just a silly question, what will happen if one tries to set SCHED_ISO
(with eg schedtool))? will the program just coninue as SCHED_NORM or die
by some signal?

(btw, I add myself to the array of people that will miss SCHED_ISO :)

also, how does the RLIMITS work? (ie, how does one set that on a
proccess, is it poosible to use schedtool to do that?)

Cheers
Fredrik

--
After all, if you are in school to study computer science, then a
professor saying:
"use this proprietary software to learn computer science" is the
same as English professor handing you a copy of Shakespeare
and saying:
"use this book to learn Shakespeare without opening the book itself."
-- Bradley Kuhn

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/