Re: [PATCH] Removing maintainer's bad e-mails

[Kurt Wall]

On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 12:49:17AM +0200, Adrian Bunk took 42 lines to write:
> On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 02:33:00PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > 
> > You may as well change the S: to unmaintained whilst
> > you're there, it hasn't seen any updates in a long time,
> > and still uses several out-of-date SCSI APIs.
> 
> Or he could completely remove the entry.
> 
> We don't have entries for every single unmaintained driver, and the 
> smaller MAINTAINERS is the higher is the possibility of not missing a 
> relevant entry when checking whom to send an email.

Hmm, so if a subsystem or driver (more drivers, I should think) lacks
an entry in MAINTAINERS, is it then reasonable to assume that it is
unmaintained? If not, perhaps creating a separate list of unmaintained
subsystems and/or drivers is prudent?

Kurt
-- 
Don't get even -- get odd!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/