Re: fcntl(F GETLEASE) semantics??

From: Michael Kerrisk
Date: Thu Aug 11 2005 - 09:43:21 EST


> Von: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

> In any case, I haven't seen a real argument for reverting to the old
> behaviour. I'd rather see an established standard, or a correct
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> real-world application that fails, not just some arbitrary test.

Agreed -- though I'd phrase it as "documented specification".

Cheers,

Michael

--
5 GB Mailbox, 50 FreeSMS http://www.gmx.net/de/go/promail
+++ GMX - die erste Adresse für Mail, Message, More +++
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/