Re: [PATCH] eliminte NMI entry/ exit code

[Linus Torvalds]

On Fri, 12 Aug 2005, George Anzinger wrote:
>
> The NMI entry and exit code fiddles with bits in the preempt count.  If 
> an NMI happens while some other code is doing the same, bits will be 
> lost.

Why?

Even if an NMI happens in the middle of a read-modify-write sequence that 
is critical, the NMI exit is supposed to undo whatever it was that the NMI 
entry did, so the preempt counters are "safe" wrt NMI: they may change, 
but they always change back by the time anybody cares.

This, btw, is something we depend on wrt _normal_ interrupts too. It's why 
people can read/modify/write preempt count without having to disable 
interrupts.

			Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/