Re: remove support for gcc < 3.2

[Bill Davidsen]

Joe wrote:

> I'm for its removal. As for the gcc project "losing its way" consider
> that 3.4 has quite matured and also has much smaller binary size from
> 3.3. 4.0 however is still too early in its development to come close
> to surpassing 3.4.

I consider that the compiler get bigger and slower with every release. 
The tools used to find overlong paths in the kernel would work well for 
gcc. Recent versions are painful, even with a decent SMP machine. The 
people compiling on laptops could spend a day building with new versions.

--
bill davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
 CTO TMR Associates, Inc
 Doing interesting things with small computers since 1979

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/