Re: [PATCH 1/6] i386 virtualization - Fix uml build

[Zachary Amsden]

Chris Wright wrote:

> * zach@xxxxxxxxxx (zach@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
>  
>
> > Attempt to fix the UML build by assuming the default i386 subarchitecture
> > (mach-default).
> >
> > I can't fully test this because spinlock breakage is still happening in
> > my tree, but it gets rid of the mach_xxx.h missing file warnings.
> >    
>
> I assume this is intended to fix a build error caused by patches in the
> earlier set which added more reliance on mach-default?
>  

Yes, I already sent the fix to Jeff and Andrew, so it may already 
included in anything based off -mm1.  But it seems a good idea in 
general for UML.  I got a 100% clean um-i386 build after this patch on 
-rc5-mm1.

Zach
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/