Re: [PATCH 0/5] LSM hook updates

[James Morris]

On Wed, 24 Aug 2005, Chris Wright wrote:

> This is based on Kurt's original work.  The net effect is that
> LSM hooks are called conditionally, and in all cases capabilities
> provide the defaults.  I've done some basic performance testing, and
> found nothing surprising.

Do you mean nothing noticable?

>  I'm interested to see numbers from others
> before I push this up.  These are against Linus' current git tree (they
> will clash with the -mm tree).

Are there any numbers for popular architectures like i386 and x86_64?


- James
-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@xxxxxxxxx>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/