Re: [PATCH] (18/22) task_thread_info - part 2/4

[Geert Uytterhoeven]

On Thu, 25 Aug 2005, Roman Zippel wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Aug 2005, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Yup.  Let's get m68k into buildable shape for 2.6.13 with Al's minimal
> > patches, and if you have further improvements over that submit them as
> > split up patches through the usual channels.  Having all architectures
> > actually build and work from mainline is really important to have
> > useful kernel package in distributions.
> 
> No, there has been no discussion of these patches, so there is no point in 
> doing this a few days before 2.6.13. Can we please do this properly for 
> 2.6.14?

Notwithstanding the actual content of the patches, I agree there's indeed no
need to hurry (unless Christoph's unifying Debian kernel hat is weighting a
lot).

A few months of delay for 2.6.14 is almost unnoticeable on the Linux/m68k
timescale anyway ;-)

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

						Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
							    -- Linus Torvalds
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/