Re: [GIT PATCH] Remove devfs from 2.6.13
From: Kyle Moffett
Date: Sun Sep 11 2005 - 10:44:11 EST
On Sep 11, 2005, at 07:44:35, linux@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
I'll bite - what distros are shipping a kernel 2.6.10 or later and
still
using devfs?
Debian. The current Debian installer is unfortunately rather tightly
coupled to devfs; the reasons for choosing it are rooted in boot
floppy
size, but the development ("unstable") install image uses 2.6.12 +
devfs.
I just had to do a little dance to install it on a machine where
2.6.12 didn't recognize the SATA controller but 2.6.13 counldn't
run the installer.
Note that Debian doesn't need devfs in normal operation; it's just
a bootstrapping tool.
That sounds like _exactly_ the case where the Debian folks could
maintain
the out-of-tree ndevfs patch for a while until they got their installer
floppies and such migrated to udev.
Cheers,
Kyle Moffett
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GCM/CS/IT/U d- s++: a18 C++++>$ UB/L/X/*++++(+)>$ P+++(++++)>$ L++++(+
++) E
W++(+) N+++(++) o? K? w--- O? M++ V? PS+() PE+(-) Y+ PGP+++ t+(+++) 5
X R?
tv-(--) b++++(++) DI+ D+ G e->++++$ h!*()>++$ r !y?(-)
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/