Re: Tainted lsmod output

[Randy.Dunlap]

On Mon, 12 Sep 2005, Hugh Dickins wrote:

> On Mon, 12 Sep 2005, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> > On Mon, 12 Sep 2005, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > >
> > > The one that puzzles me greatly isn't listed there: 'G'
> >
> > I guess it means GPL.
> >
> > It's just the opposite of 'P', whereas all of the others
> > have opposites of ' '.
>
> I guess the same, but doesn't it seem a strange kind of taint?

<tainted> has already been found to be non-0.
Looks like someone decided to reinforce the GPL-ness of
all modules at that point and that some other tainted flag(s)
should be set.

-- 
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/