Re: [PATCH 2/2] suspend: Cleanup calling of power off methods.

[Alexander Nyberg]

On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 09:35:20AM -0700 Linus Torvalds wrote:

> 
> 
> On Wed, 21 Sep 2005, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > 
> > I think you are not following the proper procedure. All the patches
> > should go through akpm.
> 
> One issue is that I actually worry that Andrew will at some point be where 
> I was a couple of years ago - overworked and stressed out by just tons and 
> tons of patches. 
> 
> Yes, he's written/modified tons of patch-tracking tools, and the git 
> merging hopefully avoids some of the pressures, but it still worries me. 
> If Andrew burns out, we'll all suffer hugely.
> 
> I'm wondering what we can do to offset those kinds of issues. I _do_ like 
> having -mm as a staging area and catching some problems there, so going 
> through andrew is wonderful in that sense, but it has downsides.
> 

Morever bugme.osdl.org is severely underworked (acpi being a noteable
exception) and Andrew has stepped in alot there too. Alot of bugs
reported on the mailing list are only followed up by Andrew.

I think he really should receive much more help than he currently does.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/