Re: [PATCH 0/3] netfilter : 3 patches to boost ip_tables performance

[Eric Dumazet]

James Morris a écrit :
> Do you have any performance measurements?

Yes, as I said in the first mail :

>In oprofile results, ipt_do_table() was at the first position.
>It is now at 6th position, using 1/3 of the CPU it was using before.
>(Tests done on a dual Xeon i386 and a dual Opteron x86_64)

On the dual opteron machine, with 40.000 packets coming per second, and 35.000 
sent per second, the numbers were : 12.8 % before the patches, 4.4 % after the 
patches.

I dont have separate perf measurements for each patch.

Considering the fact that I inlined the read_lock_bh() call (not displayed in 
oprofile results, probably because of the special .spinlock.text section) that 
should have increased the profile of ipt_do_table(), thats a lot of CPU cycles 
 and mem bandwitdh that are available for other jobs.

Eric

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/