Re: PTRACE_SYSEMU numbering

[Blaisorblade]

On Friday 23 September 2005 17:10, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 09:46:38PM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote:
> > The fix is easy, IMHO, and not even urgent. It suffices to move
> > PTRACE_SYSEMU def from <linux/ptrace.h> to <asm-i386/ptrace.h>, and we
> > didn't do that yet for laziness only. There's no architecture that I know
> > of, apart i386, which implements SYSEMU (except maybe s390, but that
> > isn't public).

> Please either renumber it to something above 0x4200,

> or make it i386 
> private.
I'm going to do this.
> If you intend for other architectures to implement it in the 
> future, renumbering it would be better.
Possibly yes, sooner or later ports will emerge, but this is already in 
production, so I have ABI issues.

For new archs, I'll use the right range.
-- 
Inform me of my mistakes, so I can keep imitating Homer Simpson's "Doh!".
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade (Skype ID "PaoloGiarrusso", ICQ 215621894)
http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade

	

	
		
___________________________________ 
Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi e allegati da 10MB 
http://mail.yahoo.it
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/