Re: [Security] "stable" vs "security stable"

From: Chris Wright
Date: Sun Oct 09 2005 - 03:10:16 EST

* Coywolf Qi Hunt (coywolf@xxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> I find the first page inconvenient for some people somehow
> since the security stable came.

It's stable, not security stable. It does contain security fixes
sometimes, but it is generally about patches that improve kernel

> Now on the page, we have and 2.6.14-rc3. If one
> wants to get 2.6.14-rc3, he shouldn't get 2.6.14-rc3 Full, but
> 2.6.14-rc3 Patch and 2.6.13 Full, which isn't there unfortunately. I
> suggest we name "security stable", and 2.6.13 "stable".

Perhaps a column B for base. Or just link to ketchup and be done with it.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at