Re: "stable" vs "security stable"
From: Valdis . Kletnieks
Date: Sun Oct 09 2005 - 03:27:23 EST
On Sun, 09 Oct 2005 15:44:38 +0800, Coywolf Qi Hunt said:
> On 10/9/05, Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx <Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx> wrote:
> It is "security stable". Let's take this new notation from now on.
> "Security Stable" doesn't have to be all security related.
Tell you what - you convince the -stable team, and I'll go along with it..
> (you want stable@xxxxxxxxxx to replace security@xxxxxxxxxx too?)
You're the one who called it "security stable" ;)
> What you did is so stupid to me to to use -R every time. -R implies
> something wrong, and need to revert.
Umm... my diff had *lower case* -r (recursive), not -R (revert)...
Description: PGP signature