Re: Problem with nfs4, kernel 184.108.40.206
From: Malte Schröder
Date: Sun Oct 09 2005 - 16:05:15 EST
Malte Schröder wrote:
> On Monday 26 September 2005 14:28, Trond Myklebust wrote:
>>Also, is this something that is NFSv4 only, or can you reproduce it on
> I have been running my "stress test" for a few hours with nfsv3, without
> I tried over nfsv4 again and it crashed after a few minutes.
I had time to try this with 220.127.116.11, I was not able to reproduce the
I also found the following post on LKML:
Bret Towe wrote:
> On 9/8/05, Bret Towe <magnade@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>On 9/6/05, J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 08:40:53PM -0700, Bret Towe wrote:
>>>>Pid: 14169, comm: xmms Tainted: G M 2.6.13
>>>Hm, can someone explain what that means? A proprietary module was
>>>loaded then unloaded, maybe?
>>>You may also want to retest with
>>>applied, to make sure there isn't a patch in Trond's series that already
>>>fixes the bug.
>>ive been running this since i got the url and so far i havent hit it
>>ive also been a bit busy so i havent been able to make sure its good
>>this weekend i should be able to test it and make sure its solved
> ran it pretty hard over the weekend and i had no crashs at all
> so i think its safe to say this patch fixes the issues i was seeing
The above server is currently unreachable from my part of the net but
Bret Towe seemed to have the same problem as I have. Since the problem
also appears when using 2.6.14-rc3 I think the patch should be looked at
and maybe considered for inclusion. As soon as I gain access to that
patch I will test it and report my results.
Description: OpenPGP digital signature