Re: [PATCH 2/3] hugetlb: Demand fault handler
From: Hugh Dickins
Date: Wed Oct 12 2005 - 02:29:39 EST
On Wed, 12 Oct 2005, David Gibson wrote:
> I'm not sure this does fully deal with truncation, I'm afraid - it
> will deal with a truncation well before the fault, but not a
> concurrent truncate(). We'll need the truncate_count/retry logic from
> do_no_page, I think. Andi/Hugh, can you confirm that's correct?
Very likely you're right, but I already explained to Adam privately
that I won't get to look at all this before tomorrow - sorry.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/