Re: [PATCH] Use of getblk differs between locations
From: Anton Altaparmakov
Date: Wed Oct 12 2005 - 15:15:09 EST
On Wed, 12 Oct 2005, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> > > Is memory management ready for this? Can't deadlock like this happen?
> > > - displaying dialog window needs memory, so it waits until memory will
> > > be available
> > > - system decides to write some write-back cached data in order to free
> > > memory
> > > - the write of these data waits until the dialog window is displayed,
> > > user inserts the device and clicks 'OK'
> > No, it's not, and deadlock is definitely possible. However, if we're at
> > the point where memory is tight enough that it's an issue, the timer can
> > expire and all the pending i/o is dropped just as it would be without
> > the multipath code enabled.
> > I'm not saying it's a solution ready for production, just a good
> > starting point.
> But discarding data sometimes on USB unplug is even worse than discarding data
> always --- users will by experimenting learn that linux doesn't discard
> write-cached data and reminds them to replug the device --- and one day,
> randomly, they lose their data because of some memory management condition...
And how exactly is that worse than discarding the data every time?!?!?!?
Anton Altaparmakov <aia21 at cam.ac.uk> (replace at with @)
Unix Support, Computing Service, University of Cambridge, CB2 3QH, UK
Linux NTFS maintainer / IRC: #ntfs on irc.freenode.net
WWW: http://linux-ntfs.sf.net/ & http://www-stu.christs.cam.ac.uk/~aia21/
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/