Re: [PATCH] Use of getblk differs between locations
From: Jeff Mahoney
Date: Wed Oct 12 2005 - 16:17:05 EST
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Mikulas Patocka wrote:
>>> But discarding data sometimes on USB unplug is even worse than
>>> discarding data
>>> always --- users will by experimenting learn that linux doesn't discard
>>> write-cached data and reminds them to replug the device --- and one day,
>>> randomly, they lose their data because of some memory management
>> And how exactly is that worse than discarding the data every time?!?!?!?
> Undeterministic behaviour is worse than deterministic. You can learn the
> system that behaves deterministically.
> If you know that unplug damages filesystem on your USB disk, you replug
> it, recheck filesystem and copy the important data again --- you have 0%
> probability of data damage.
> However, if damage on unplug happens only with 1/100 probability, will
> you still check filesystem and copy all recently created files on it?
> You forget it (or you wouldn't even know that damage might occur) and
> you have 1% probability of data damage.
I agree that dependability is important, but so important that we keep
the absolute worst case scenario for all cases because it could happen
occasionally? We can warn the user that removing media without umounting
/ejecting it may cause data loss and prompt them to reinsert the media.
If they don't reinsert the media soon enough (for any reason, including
the availabilty of memory) we can inform them that data loss may have
occured and that they should attempt to recover the file system.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/