Re: [patch 2.6.14-rc4] i386: spinlock optimization

[linux-os (Dick Johnson)]

On Fri, 14 Oct 2005, Andrew Morton wrote:

> "linux-os \(Dick Johnson\)" <linux-os@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>  Somehow, these spin-locks got all screwed up.
>>
>>  Given: nobody has the lock. The lock variable is 0.
>
> Unlocked locks have .raw_lock.slock = 1, not 0.
>

Hmmm. Okay. Doesn't that add more code?


Cheers,
Dick Johnson
Penguin : Linux version 2.6.13.4 on an i686 machine (5589.46 BogoMips).
Warning : 98.36% of all statistics are fiction.
.

****************************************************************
The information transmitted in this message is confidential and may be privileged.  Any review, retransmission, dissemination, or other use of this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited.  If you are not the intended recipient, please notify Analogic Corporation immediately - by replying to this message or by sending an email to DeliveryErrors@xxxxxxxxxxxx - and destroy all copies of this information, including any attachments, without reading or disclosing them.

Thank you.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/