Re: Possible memory ordering bug in page reclaim?
From: David S. Miller
Date: Sat Oct 15 2005 - 18:07:38 EST
From: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 22:07:01 +0200
> sure see alpha:
> __asm__ __volatile__(
> "1: ldq_l %0,%1\n"
> " addq %0,%3,%2\n"
> " addq %0,%3,%0\n"
> " stq_c %0,%1\n"
> " beq %0,2f\n"
> " mb\n"
> the memory barrier is applied way after the write is visible to other
> cpus, you can even get an irq before the mb and block there for some
For atomic operations returning values, there must be a memory
barrier both before and after the atomic operation. This is
defined in Documentation/atomic_ops.txt, so Alpha needs to be
fixed to add a memory barrier at the beginning of these
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/