Re: lock_kernel twice possible ?

[Bill Davidsen]

Coywolf Qi Hunt wrote:
> On 10/15/05, li nux <lnxluv@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Sorry, couldn't get what you want to say.
> > Can you please elaborate.
>
>
> http://www.zipworld.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/top-posting.txt
> http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html

The whole post fit on one screen and he was not continuing the 
conversation, he was commenting on your post as a whole. I think you're 
being a bit pedantic here.

I don't think his reply failed your criteria, it wasn't overlong, it 
didn't break a flowing discussion, and no backward reading was required.

~~~~~~~

Q:  Why is top-posting evil?

A1: Because top-posters tend to leave the entirety of the email to which
    they are replying intact, so the email gets too long.

A2: Because we prefer to use bottom-posting, and it is *extremely* hard to
    maintain a coherently flowing email conversation when some of the
    participants are bottom-posting and some are top-posting.

A3: backwards read don't humans because

--
   -bill davidsen (davidsen@xxxxxxx)
"The secret to procrastination is to put things off until the
 last possible moment - but no longer"  -me
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/