Re: 2.6.14-rc5 e1000 and page allocation failures.. still

[Bill Davidsen]

Jesse Brandeburg wrote:
> On 10/23/05, Robert Hancock <hancockr@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > John Bäckstrand wrote:
> >
> > > Im seeing a massive amount of page allocation failures with 2.6.14-rc5,
> > > and also earlier kernels, see "E1000 - page allocation failure - saga
>
> [snip]
>
> > It looks like you have enough memory free - the problem is that the
> > driver is allocating a block of memory with order 3, which is 8 pages.
> > Quite likely there are not enough contiguous free pages to satisfy that.
> >
> > That's an awful big buffer size for a packet - I assume you're using
> > jumbo frames or something? Ideally the driver and hardware should be
> > able to allocate a buffer for those packets in multiple chunks, but I
> > have no idea if this is possible.
>
>
> the latest e1000 driver (6.2.15) from http://sf.net/projects/e1000
> fixes this by using multiple descriptors for jumbo frames, therefore
> only doing order 0 (single page) page allocations.
>
> let us know how it goes.
>
> BTW why is this so much more common with recent kernels?

I don't know why it's more common, but I agree that it seems so. I have 
speculated that it may be related to 4k stack, but I can't even generate 
a credible wild-ass guess on that, much less find any evidence, so I 
doubt that's much if any correlation.

Getting memory a page at a time is ugly, but it will probably work just 
fine.

--
   -bill davidsen (davidsen@xxxxxxx)
"The secret to procrastination is to put things off until the
 last possible moment - but no longer"  -me
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/