Re: PATCH: EDAC - clean up atomic stuff

[Andrew Morton]

ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Eric W. Biederman) wrote:
>
> Hmm.  Looking at the patch it is most definitely being called from
>  process context.

Well if we retain KM_BOUNCE_READ then we'll need local_irq_save().  If
edac_mc_scrub_block() will alwyas be called from process context then we
can use KM_USER0 and leave interrupts enabled.

Alan, can you confirm please?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/