Re: [Lhms-devel] [PATCH 0/7] Fragmentation Avoidance V19

From: Martin J. Bligh
Date: Fri Nov 04 2005 - 10:20:09 EST


> Seriously, it does appear that doing it per-task is adequate for your
> needs, and it is certainly more general.
>
>
>
> I cannot understand why you decided to count only the number of
> direct-reclaim events, via a "digitally filtered, constant time based,
> event frequency meter".
>
> a) It loses information. If we were to export the number of pages
> reclaimed from the mm, filtering can be done in userspace.
>
> b) It omits reclaim performed by kswapd and by other tasks (ok, it's
> very cpuset-specific).
>
> c) It only counts synchronous try_to_free_pages() attempts. What if an
> attempt only freed pagecache, or didbn't manage to free anything?
>
> d) It doesn't notice if kswapd is swapping the heck out of your
> not-allocating-any-memory-now process.
>
>
> I think all the above can be addressed by exporting per-task (actually
> per-mm) reclaim info. (I haven't put much though into what info that
> should be - page reclaim attempts, mmapped reclaims, swapcache reclaims,
> etc)

I've been looking at similar things. When we page out / free something from
a shared library that 10 tasks have mapped, who does that count against
for pressure?

M.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/