Re: [PATCH 4/4] Memory Add Fixes for ppc64

[Mike Kravetz]

On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 11:59:42AM +1100, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> Mike Kravetz writes:
> > ppc64 needs a special sysfs probe file for adding new memory.
> 
> Does arch/powerpc/Kconfig need a similar fix then?

Yes it does.  Sorry, I haven't been paying as much attention to the
merge as I should.  Here is a new version.

ppc64 needs a special sysfs probe file for adding new memory.

Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <kravetz@xxxxxxxxxx>

diff -Naupr linux-2.6.14-git7/arch/powerpc/Kconfig linux-2.6.14-git7.work/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
--- linux-2.6.14-git7/arch/powerpc/Kconfig	2005-11-04 21:21:05.000000000 +0000
+++ linux-2.6.14-git7.work/arch/powerpc/Kconfig	2005-11-07 17:32:45.000000000 +0000
@@ -569,6 +569,10 @@ config HAVE_ARCH_EARLY_PFN_TO_NID
 	def_bool y
 	depends on NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES
 
+config ARCH_MEMORY_PROBE
+	def_bool y
+	depends on MEMORY_HOTPLUG
+
 # Some NUMA nodes have memory ranges that span
 # other nodes.  Even though a pfn is valid and
 # between a node's start and end pfns, it may not
diff -Naupr linux-2.6.14-git7/arch/ppc64/Kconfig linux-2.6.14-git7.work/arch/ppc64/Kconfig
--- linux-2.6.14-git7/arch/ppc64/Kconfig	2005-11-04 21:21:06.000000000 +0000
+++ linux-2.6.14-git7.work/arch/ppc64/Kconfig	2005-11-07 17:31:51.000000000 +0000
@@ -277,6 +277,10 @@ config HAVE_ARCH_EARLY_PFN_TO_NID
 	def_bool y
 	depends on NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES
 
+config ARCH_MEMORY_PROBE
+	def_bool y
+	depends on MEMORY_HOTPLUG
+
 # Some NUMA nodes have memory ranges that span
 # other nodes.  Even though a pfn is valid and
 # between a node's start and end pfns, it may not
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/