[PATCH 14/21] i386 Apm is on cpu zero only

From: Zachary Amsden
Date: Mon Nov 07 2005 - 23:33:57 EST


APM BIOS code has a protective wrapper that runs it only on CPU zero. Thus,
no need to set APM BIOS segments in the GDT for other CPUs.

Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden <zach@xxxxxxxxxx>
Index: linux-2.6.14-zach-work/arch/i386/kernel/apm.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.14-zach-work.orig/arch/i386/kernel/apm.c 2005-11-07 10:17:45.000000000 -0800
+++ linux-2.6.14-zach-work/arch/i386/kernel/apm.c 2005-11-07 13:36:05.000000000 -0800
@@ -2170,8 +2170,8 @@ static struct dmi_system_id __initdata a
static int __init apm_init(void)
{
struct proc_dir_entry *apm_proc;
+ struct desc_struct *gdt;
int ret;
- int i;

dmi_check_system(apm_dmi_table);

@@ -2253,18 +2253,17 @@ static int __init apm_init(void)
* not restrict themselves to their claimed limit. When this happens,
* they will cause a segmentation violation in the kernel at boot time.
* Most BIOS's, however, will respect a 64k limit, so we use that.
+ *
+ * Note we only set APM segments on CPU zero, since we pin the APM
+ * code to that CPU.
*/
- for (i = 0; i < NR_CPUS; i++) {
- struct desc_struct *gdt = get_cpu_gdt_table(i);
- if (!gdt)
- continue;
- set_base(&gdt[APM_CS >> 3],
- __va((unsigned long)apm_info.bios.cseg << 4));
- set_base(&gdt[APM_CS_16 >> 3],
- __va((unsigned long)apm_info.bios.cseg_16 << 4));
- set_base(&gdt[APM_DS >> 3],
- __va((unsigned long)apm_info.bios.dseg << 4));
- }
+ gdt = get_cpu_gdt_table(0);
+ set_base(&gdt[APM_CS >> 3],
+ __va((unsigned long)apm_info.bios.cseg << 4));
+ set_base(&gdt[APM_CS_16 >> 3],
+ __va((unsigned long)apm_info.bios.cseg_16 << 4));
+ set_base(&gdt[APM_DS >> 3],
+ __va((unsigned long)apm_info.bios.dseg << 4));

apm_proc = create_proc_info_entry("apm", 0, NULL, apm_get_info);
if (apm_proc)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/