Re: [patch 1/1] cpufreq_conservative/ondemand: invert meaning of 'ignore nice'
From: Con Kolivas
Date: Thu Nov 10 2005 - 18:12:53 EST
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 04:00, Alexander Clouter wrote:
> The use of the 'ignore_nice' sysfs file is confusing to anyone using it.
> This removes the sysfs file 'ignore_nice' and in its place creates a
> 'ignore_nice_load' entry which defaults to '0'; meaning nice'd processes
> *are* counted towards the 'business' caclulation.
My 'nice'd compiles thank you from the bottom of their little cc1 hearts for
changing your mind.
Cheers,
Con
Attachment:
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature