Re: [PATCH 1/5] Light Fragmentation Avoidance V20: 001_antidefrag_flags

From: Mel Gorman
Date: Tue Nov 15 2005 - 20:36:55 EST


On Tue, 15 Nov 2005, Paul Jackson wrote:

> Mel wrote:
> > #define __GFP_VALID ((__force gfp_t)0x80000000u) /* valid GFP flags */
> >
> > +/*
> > + * Allocation type modifier
> > + * __GFP_EASYRCLM: Easily reclaimed pages like userspace or buffer pages
> > + */
> > +#define __GFP_EASYRCLM 0x80000u /* User and other easily reclaimed pages */
> > +
>
> How about fitting the style (casts, just one line) of the other flags,
> so that these added six lines become instead just the one line:
>
> #define __GFP_EASYRCLM ((__force gfp_t)0x80000u) /* easily reclaimed pages */
>
> (Yeah - it was probably me that asked for -more- comments sometime in
> the past - consistency is not my strong suit ;).
>

No, you're right, my declaration is wrong. Changed to

+#define __GFP_EASYRCLM ((__force gfp_t)0x80000u)

Comment to right removed because the comment above the declaration covers
everything.

--
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student Java Applications Developer
University of Limerick IBM Dublin Software Lab
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/