Re: rfc/rft: use r10 as current on x86-64

[Brian Gerst]

Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 11:52:04AM -0500, Benjamin LaHaise wrote:
> > Hello Andi et al,
> >
> > The patch below converts x86-64 to use r10 as the current pointer instead 
> > of gs:pcurrent.  This results in a ~34KB savings in the code segment of 
> > the kernel.  I've tested this with running a few regular applications, 
> > plus a few 32 bit binaries.  If this patch is interesting, it probably 
> > makes sense to merge the thread info structure into the task_struct so 
> > that the assembly bits for syscall entry can be cleaned up.  Comments?
>
> I think you could get most of the benefit by just dropping
> the volatile and "memory" from read_pda(). With that gcc would
> usually CSE current into a register and it would would work essentially
> the same way with only minor more .text overhead, but r10 would be still
> available.

It seems that GCC is reluctant to use the extended registers anyways 
because of the rex prefix, so I don't think dedicating r10 to current 
will cause that many problems.

--
				Brian Gerst
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/