RE: [PATCH] Add VT flag to cpuinfo

[Dugger, Donald D]

Andi-

Good guess.  We discuessed it and decided that `vmx' was the best
term so I'll rework the patch to use that name.

BTW, I don't see any reference to `vmx' in the 2.6.14 tree, is
this a change you recently made to your tree?

--
Don Dugger
"Censeo Toto nos in Kansa esse decisse." - D. Gale
Donald.D.Dugger@xxxxxxxxx
Ph: (303)440-1368 

>-----Original Message-----
>From: linux-kernel-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
>[mailto:linux-kernel-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Andi Kleen
>Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 6:53 PM
>To: Dugger, Donald D
>Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Shah, Rajesh; akpm@xxxxxxxx
>Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add VT flag to cpuinfo
>
>donald.d.dugger@xxxxxxxxx (Donald D Dugger) writes:
>
>> Andrew-
>> 
>> Attached is a trivial patch to 2.6 that will add `vt' to the 
>flags field
>> of `/proc/cpuinfo' for CPUs that have Intel's virtualization 
>technology.
>
>The x86-64 tree already has "vmx" for it. What is the correct
>name? 
>
>-Andi
>-
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe 
>linux-kernel" in
>the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/