Re: Linux in a binary world... a doomsday scenario

[Jeff Garzik]

David Woodhouse wrote:
> Since the protection of EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() is only relevant if you are
> actually found to be in violation of the licence, we might as well be
> using it for all symbols. If you fervently believe that binary-only
> modules are legal, you can still go ahead and use them. It's just that
> you'd better be _very_ sure of yourself before you do so, because if you
> _do_ lose in court you'll be getting more than a slap on the wrist.
>
> By switching in the opposite direction, Linus is actively weakening our
> position, and I object very strongly to that.


Linus made a pragmatic technical decision for the benefit of a bunch of 
Linux users, a decision I support despite the fact that NVIDIA are a 
bunch of sillyheads.

Realistically, no position was weakened, nothing new happened.

In the context of the larger thread, the doomsday scenario is highly 
unlikely because of positive engineering attributes of open source. 
Smart companies want open source drivers not because people snipe at 
them verbally and legally, but because the process produces superior 
engineering in the end.

	Jeff


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/