Re: [PATCH 03/13] [RFC] ipath copy routines

[David S. Miller]

From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 19:19:32 -0800

> That would make sense.  Give it a non-ipath-related name and require that
> all architectures which wish to run this driver must implement that
> (documented) function.
> 
> And, in Kconfig, make sure that architectures which don't implement that
> library function do not attempt to build this driver.  To avoid breaking
> `make allmodconfig'.

How about we implement a portable version in C that you get
by default if you don't implement the assembler routine?
Pretty please? :-)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/