Re: [POLL] SLAB : Are the 32 and 192 bytes caches really usefull on x86_64 machines ?

[Dave Jones]

On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 03:09:02PM +0100, Folkert van Heusden wrote:

 > > Your results are interesting : size-32 seems to use objects of size 64 !
 > > > size-32             1538   2714     64 <<HERE>>
 > > So I guess that size-32 cache could be avoided at least for EMT (I take you 
 > > run a 64 bits kernel ?)
 > 
 > I think I do yes:
 > Linux xxxxx 2.4.21-37.EL #1 SMP Wed Sep 7 13:32:18 EDT 2005 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
 > It is a redhat 4 x64 system.

Looks more like RHEL3 judging from the kernel version.

		Dave

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/