Re: [patch 0/9] mutex subsystem, -V4

[Ingo Molnar]

* Nicolas Pitre <nico@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> [...] on ARMv6 at least this can be improved even further, but a 
> special implementation which is neither a fully qualified atomic 
> decrement nor an atomic swap is needed. [...]

i'm curious, how would this ARMv6 solution look like, and what would be 
the advantages over the atomic swap based variant?

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/