Re: [patch 0/9] mutex subsystem, -V4

[Sean]

On Thu, December 22, 2005 6:53 pm, Randy.Dunlap said:

> Andrew can surely answer that, but it could be something as
> simple as wanting to build a more stable kernel (one without
> so much churn), so that things have time to mature and
> improve without breaking so many other things...
>
> This (current) is a hectic development cycle style.

Sure, its probably that simple.  Just seems like the techincal arguments
clearly support adding a mutex.

Sean

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/