Re: Latency traces I cannot interpret (sa1100, 2.6.15-rc7-rt1)

[Lee Revell]

On Thu, 2005-12-29 at 16:08 +0100, kus Kusche Klaus wrote:
> However, traces 1, 2, 6 and 7 are completely mysterious to me.
> Interrupts seem to be blocked for milliseconds, while nothing is going
> on on the system? Moreover, there are console-related function names
> in
> traces 6 and 7, although I've unconfigured the framebuffer console for
> these runs!
> 

It seems that either some code path really is forgetting to re-enable
interrupts, or there's a bug in the latency tracer.

Do these correspond to observed latencies?

Lee

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/