Re: 2.6.15-rt1

[YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明]

In article <9c21eeae0601032316l3259fbecle6a0b290ed244e12@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (at Tue, 3 Jan 2006 23:16:02 -0800), David Brown <dmlb2000@xxxxxxxxx> says:

> patch-2.6.15-rt1-1 has the ipv6 patch yet is smaller than the initial
> patch. I created the patch using:
> $ diff -uprN linux-2.6.15 linux-2.6.15-rt1 > patch-2.6.15-rt1-1
> 
> Is this not the way you did it? I noticed different headers in my
> patch vs. the patch posted. Really I'm concerned about missing
> anything in the patch, considering it's 700+ lines smaller.

I have linux-2.6 git tree and I did something like this:

$ cd linux-2.6
$ patch -p1 < /tmp/patch-2.6.15-rt1
hack, hack, hack...
$ patch -p1 -R < /tmp/patch-2.6.15-rt1
$ git reset
$ git diff

--yoshfuji
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/