Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response

[Con Kolivas]

On Fri, 6 Jan 2006 10:13 am, Peter Williams wrote:
> If the plugsched patches were included in -mm we could get wider testing
> of alternative scheduling mechanisms.  But I think it will take a lot of
> testing of the new schedulers to allay fears that they may introduce new
> problems of their own.

When I first generated plugsched and posted it to lkml for inclusion in -mm it 
was blocked as having no chance of being included by both Ingo and Linus and 
I doubt they've changed their position since then. As you're well aware this 
is why I gave up working on it and let you maintain it since then. Obviously 
I thought it was a useful feature or I wouldn't have worked on it.

Con
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/