Re: Platform device matching, & weird strncmp usage

From: Kurtis D. Rader
Date: Sat Jan 07 2006 - 14:23:52 EST


On Fri, 2006-01-06 16:59:39, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> In 2.6.15, platform device matching works according to this comment in
> the code, or rather are supposed to:
>
> * Platform device IDs are assumed to be encoded like this:
> * "<name><instance>", where <name> is a short description of the
> * type of device, like "pci" or "floppy", and <instance> is the
> * enumerated instance of the device, like '0' or '42'.
>
> However, looking a few lines below, I see the actual implemetation:
>
> static int platform_match(struct device * dev, struct device_driver * drv)
> {
> struct platform_device *pdev = container_of(dev, struct platform_device, dev);
>
> return (strncmp(pdev->name, drv->name, BUS_ID_SIZE) == 0);
> }
>
> As far as I know, strncmp() is _NOT_ supposed to return 0 if one string
> is shorter than the other and they match until that point. Thus the
> above will never match unless the <name> portion of pdev->name is
> exactly of size BUS_ID_SIZE which is obviously not the case...
>
> Did I miss something or do we expect a "special" semantic for strncmp in
> the kernel ?

I can't speak to the correctness of that code but your understanding of
strncmp() is incorrect. From "GNU C Library Application Fundamentals":

This function is the [sic] similar to strcmp, except that no more
than size wide characters are compared. In other words, if the two
strings are the same in their first size wide characters, the return
value is zero.

And this has been may experience for the past 20 years and is confirmed by
this trivial program which prints zero in both cases:

#include <string.h>
#include <stdio.h>
int main() {
printf("%d\n", strncmp("abc","abcd",3));
printf("%d\n", strncmp("abcd","abc",3));
}
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/