Re: [PATCH]: How to be a kernel driver maintainer

[Ben Collins]

On Sun, 2006-01-08 at 17:33 +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-01-08 at 11:07 -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> > 
> > +The other side of the coin is keeping changes in the kernel synced to
> > your
> > +code. Often times, it is necessary to change a kernel API (driver
> > model,
> > +USB stack changes, networking subsystem change, etc). These sorts of
> > +changes usually affect a large number of drivers. It is not feasible
> > for
> > +these changes to be individually submitted to the driver maintainers.
> > So
> > +instead, the changes are made together in the kernel tree. If your
> > driver
> > +is affected, you are expected to pick up these changes and merge them
> > with
> > +your primary code (e.g. if you have a CVS repo for maintaining your
> > code).
> > +Usually this job is made easier if you use the same source control
> > system
> > +that the kernel maintainers use (currently, git), but this is not
> > +required.
> 
> I don't quite agree with this part. This encourages cvs use, and "cvs
> mentality". I *much* rather have something written as "the primary
> location of your driver becomes the kernel.org git tree. This may feel
> like you're giving away control, but it's not really. If you maintain
> your driver there, people will still send patches via you for
> approval/review. Of course you can keep a master copy in your own
> version control repository, however be aware that most users will see
> the kernel.org tree one as THE drivers. In addition, merging changes and
> keeping uptodate is a lot harder that way. And worse, keeping the "main"
> version outside the kernel.org tree tends to cause huge deviations and
> backlogs between your main tree and the "real" kernel.org tree, with the
> result that it becomes impossible to find regressions when you DO merge
> the changes over. 

But this isn't at al true. Almost all subsystems maintain the primary
tree outside of the kernel, with the kernel being the primary _stable_
tree. USB, Netdev, Alsa, etc. All changes go someplace else before being
pushed to the primary kernel tree. 99% of the time, patches are going
somewhere else before going into the main kernel. So the above
paragraphs is really misleading.

-- 
   Ben Collins <ben.collins@xxxxxxxxxx>
   Developer
   Ubuntu Linux

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/