Re: [PATCH] [5/6] Handle TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK for i386

[Andrew Morton]

David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> The attached patch handles TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK as added by David Woodhouse's
> patch entitled:
> 
>         [PATCH] 2/3 Add TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK support for arch/powerpc
>         [PATCH] 3/3 Generic sys_rt_sigsuspend
> 
> It does the following:
> 
>  (1) Declares TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK for i386.
> 
>  (2) Invokes it over to do_signal() when TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK is set.
> 
>  (3) Makes do_signal() support TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK, using the signal mask saved
>      in current->saved_sigmask.
> 
>  (4) Discards sys_rt_sigsuspend() from the arch, using the generic one instead.
> 
>  (5) Makes sys_sigsuspend() save the signal mask and set TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK
>      rather than attempting to fudge the return registers.
> 
>  (6) Makes sys_sigsuspend() return -ERESTARTNOHAND rather than looping
>      intrinsically.
> 
>  (7) Makes setup_frame(), setup_rt_frame() and handle_signal() return 0 or
>      -EFAULT rather than true/false to be consistent with the rest of the
>      kernel.
> 
> Due to the fact do_signal() is then only called from one place:
> 
>  (8) Makes do_signal() no longer have a return value is it was just being
>      ignored; force_sig() takes care of this.
> 
>  (9) Discards the old sigmask argument to do_signal() as it's no longer
>      necessary.
> 
> (10) Makes do_signal() static.
> 
> (11) Marks the second argument to do_notify_resume() as unused. The unused
>      argument should remain in the middle as the arguments are passed in as
>      registers, and the ordering is specific in entry.S
> 
> Given the way do_signal() is now no longer called from sys_{,rt_}sigsuspend(),
> they no longer need access to the exception frame, and so can just take
> arguments normally.
> 
> This patch depends on sys_rt_sigsuspend patch.

I have problems with this patch.

With

	generic-sys_rt_sigsuspend.patch
	handle-tif_restore_sigmask-for-frv.patch
	handle-tif_restore_sigmask-for-i386.patch

applied, or with all of David's patches applied, an FC5-test1 machine hangs
during the login process (local vt or sshd).  An FC1 machine doesn't
exhibit the problem.

dmesg+sysrq-t:
	http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/dmesg

.config:
	http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/config-sony

culprit patches:
	http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/generic-sys_rt_sigsuspend.patch
	http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/handle-tif_restore_sigmask-for-i386.patch

(I retested with just current -linus and the above two patches.  Same
deal).

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/