Re: Dual core Athlons and unsynced TSCs

[Sven-Thorsten Dietrich]

On Fri, 2006-01-13 at 10:55 -0800, thockin@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 01:09:51PM -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
> > > Some apps/users need higher resolution and lower overhead that only rdtsc
> > > can offer currently.
> > 
> > But obviously if the TSC gives wildly inaccurate results, it cannot be
> > used no matter how low the overhead.
> 
> unless we can re-sync the TSCs often enough that apps don't notice.
> 

You'd have to quantify that somehow, in terms of the max drift rate
(ppm), and the max resolution available (< tsc frequency).  

Either that, or track an offset, and use one TSC as truth, and update
the correction factor for the other TSCs as often as needed, maybe?

This is kind of analogous to the "drift" NTP calculates against a
free-running oscillator. 

So you'd be pushing that functionality deeper into the OS-core.

Dave Mills had that "hardpps" stuff in there for a while, it might be a
starting point.

Just some thoughts for now... 

Sven

> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-- 
***********************************
Sven-Thorsten Dietrich
Real-Time Software Architect
MontaVista Software, Inc.
1237 East Arques Ave.
Sunnyvale, CA 94085

Phone: 408.992.4515
Fax: 408.328.9204

http://www.mvista.com
Platform To Innovate
*********************************** 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/