Re: [Ext2-devel] Re: Fall back io scheduler for 2.6.15?

[Mingming Cao]

On Fri, 2006-01-13 at 17:49 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Mingming Cao <cmm@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On 2.6.14, the
> > fall back io scheduler (if the chosen io scheduler is not found) is set
> > to the default io scheduler (anticipatory, in this case), but since
> > 2.6.15-rc1, this semanistic is changed to fall back to noop.
> 
> OK.  And I assume that AS wasn't compiled, so that's why it fell back?
> 

AS was compiled, and AS is set as the default scheduler. But since
2.6.15 doesn't recognize "elevator=as" (we need to say
"elevator=anticipatory"), so in 2.6.15, elevator_setup_default() will
explicitly fall back to "noop" scheduler.

2.6.14 doesn't recognize "elevator=as" either, but it fall back to the
default scheduler instead. Which makes more sense, as Jen pointed out.

> I actually thought that elevator= got removed, now we have
> /sys/block/sda/queue/scheduler.  But I guess that's not very useful with
> CONFIG_SYSFS=n.
> 
> > Is there any reason to fall back to noop instead of as?  It seems
> > anticipatory is much better than noop for ext3 with large sequential
> > write tests (i.e, 1G dd test) ...
> 
> I suspect that was an accident.  Jens?
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
> for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
> searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> Ext2-devel mailing list
> Ext2-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ext2-devel
> 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/