Re: [PATCH 3/4] compact print_symbol() output

[Chuck Ebbert]

In-Reply-To: <200601171601.52995.ak@xxxxxxx>

On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 at 16:01:52 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:

> On Tuesday 17 January 2006 16:01, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> 
> > I've often found symbolsize useful.  Not when looking at an oops
> > from my own machine.  But when looking at an oops posted on LKML,
> > from someone who most likely has a different .config and different
> > compiler, different optimization and different inlining from mine.
> > symbolsize is a good clue as to how close their kernel is to the
> > one I've got built on my machine, how likely guesses I make based
> > on mine will apply to theirs, and whereabouts in the function that
> > it oopsed.
> 
> Yes that is why I want it too.

OK, how about this: remove the "0x" from the function size, i.e. print:

        kernel_symbol+0xd3/10e

instead of:

        kernel_symbol+0xd3/0x10e

This saves two characters per symbol and it should still be clear that
the second number is hexadecimal.

Does that break any tools?
-- 
Chuck
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/