Re: [PATCH] CONFIG_UNWIND_INFO
From: Paul Mackerras
Date: Thu Jan 19 2006 - 23:48:56 EST
Andi Kleen writes:
> The module loader should be discarding these sections on most architectures
> because there is nothing that needs them and it's just a waste of memory
> to store them.
Apparently the module loader loads all sections marked SHF_ALLOC,
reasonably enough.
Why would we want the unwind tables in the .ko but not in kernel
memory? Isn't the point of this so that we can add an in-kernel
unwinder?
Paul.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/