Re: [PATCH] x_tables: fix alignment on [at least] ppc32

From: Mikael Pettersson
Date: Fri Jan 20 2006 - 04:36:28 EST


David S. Miller writes:
> From: Harald Welte <laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 01:45:12 +0100
>
> > [NETFILTER] x_tables: Fix XT_ALIGN() macro on [at least] ppc32
> >
> > To keep backwards compatibility with old iptables userspace programs,
> > the new XT_ALIGN macro always has to return the same value as IPT_ALIGN,
> > IP6T_ALIGN or ARPT_ALIGN in previous kernels.
> >
> > However, in those kernels the macro was defined in dependency to the
> > respective layer3 specifi data structures, which we can no longer do with
> > x_tables.
> >
> > The fix is an ugly kludge, but it has been tested to solve the problem. Yet
> > another reason to move away from the current {ip,ip6,arp,eb}tables like
> > data structures.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Harald Welte <laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Harald, I'm going to modify this to just use u_int64_t as that
> should be totally sufficient.

ACK. Both Harald's patch and DaveM's simplification of it
(simply s/void */u_int64_t/g in XT_ALIGN()) fix the iptables
problems on my ppc32 box.

/Mikael
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/