Re: Development tree, PLEASE?

[Vincent Hanquez]

On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 01:29:44PM -0500, Johan Kullstam wrote:
> Why not just drop the "2"?  It's not like the "2" is going anywhere
> with current or even with the past development models.  2.X.Y has
> already been used (for X = 0-6 and modest Y), so 6.16.1 could be used
> instead of 2.6.16-rc1.

Just want to make clear, I wasn't taking about reusing 2.0, 2.1 ..
but just continue from 2.6 as the following example:
   
   2.6.16   => 2.7.0
   2.6.16.1 => 2.7.1
   2.6.16.2 => 2.7.2
   2.6.17   => 2.8.0
   2.6.18   => 2.9.0
   ...

The development model stays exactly the same:
i.e. 2.X.0 kernels are released every ~N weeks by Linus.

-- 
Vincent Hanquez
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/